NIM for LLM Benchmarking Guide

Type: Guide Tags: NVIDIA, NIM, LLM, benchmarking, AIPerf, GenAI-Perf, latency, throughput, TTFT, ITL, TPS, RPS Related: NVIDIA-NIM, NIM-for-Large-Language-Models, NVIDIA-Run-ai, NVIDIA-AIPerf, NVIDIA-GenAI-Perf, TensorRT-LLM, Triton-Inference-Server, Triton-Performance-Analyzer, NVIDIA-Dynamo, NIXL, NVIDIA-AI-Enterprise, NVIDIA-Enterprise-Reference-Architectures, LLM-Inference-Quick-Start-Recipes, Nemotron Sources: https://docs.nvidia.com/nim/benchmarking/llm/latest/overview.html, https://docs.nvidia.com/nim/benchmarking/llm/latest/, https://docs.nvidia.com/nim/benchmarking/llm/latest/step-by-step.html, https://docs.nvidia.com/aiperf/welcome-to-ai-perf-documentation, https://docs.nvidia.com/aiperf/getting-started/migrating-from-gen-ai-perf, https://docs.nvidia.com/enterprise-reference-architectures/nim-llm-with-run-ai-and-vanilla-kubernetes.pdf Last Updated: 2026-04-29

Summary

NIM for LLM Benchmarking Guide is NVIDIA’s current guide for measuring LLM inference latency and throughput for NIM-style deployments. It explains LLM serving stages, benchmark metrics, load parameters, and NVIDIA-AIPerf workflows for measuring OpenAI-compatible LLM services while preserving older NVIDIA-GenAI-Perf context.

Detail

Purpose

LLM applications need cost-efficient serving that stays responsive under realistic traffic. The benchmarking guide helps teams measure whether a deployment can meet latency, throughput, and concurrency requirements before production rollout.

Current scope

  • Explains the queuing, prefill, and generation phases of LLM inference.
  • Defines core metrics such as Time to First Token (TTFT), end-to-end latency, inter-token latency (ITL), tokens per second (TPS), and requests per second (RPS).
  • Discusses load-control parameters such as concurrency, request rate, input sequence length, output sequence length, and streaming behavior.
  • Compares general benchmarking tools such as Locust/K6 with LLM-specialized tooling such as NVIDIA AIPerf, GenAI-Perf, and LLMPerf.
  • Provides step-by-step guidance for benchmarking an OpenAI-compatible Llama-3 NIM inference service.
  • Includes guidance for benchmarking LoRA and multi-LoRA deployments.
  • The Enterprise RA Run:ai paper applies the same latency/throughput mindset to sizing concurrent users for NIM LLMs on full GPUs, fractional GPUs, and simultaneous multi-model deployments.

NVIDIA context

This guide is not a model NIM. It is the performance-measurement companion for NIM-for-Large-Language-Models, NVIDIA-AIPerf, TensorRT-LLM, Triton-Inference-Server, and larger-scale serving layers such as NVIDIA-Dynamo.

Connections

Source Excerpts

  • NVIDIA docs describe the guide as covering important LLM inference latency and throughput metrics.
  • The current docs use AIPerf to benchmark OpenAI-compatible LLM inference services and plot latency-throughput curves.
  • The NIM LLM with Run:ai Enterprise RA paper sizes H100 NVL examples against concurrent users, throughput, and TTFT targets.

Resources